firmulate.com/benchmarks.html — live view
AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).
Firmulate — The AI That Wrote 80 Rules and Lost the Deal Anyway
Live on firmulate.com.

For those caring for seniors or overseeing complex workflows, trust and discipline are paramount. Even in the fast-paced world of AI decision-making, thoroughness alone doesn’t guarantee success. A recent experiment reveals that AI models, despite detailed analysis and perfect crisis detection, can still miss critical opportunities if they lack focus and prioritization.

For listenersOffer from Amazon

Turn quiet afternoons into listening time

  • Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
  • Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
  • Cancel anytime
Try Audible free Free trial for new members
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

How Diligence and Volume Fall Short in AI Decision-Making

In an ongoing real-world experiment, four leading AI models were tasked with running a simulated small software company through its worst week — facing the same crises, temptations, and challenges. The goal? To see whether these models could not only identify issues but also make the right decisions to close a major deal worth €55,000 monthly recurring revenue (MRR).

The Results Are Eye-Opening

All four models managed to spot every crisis and refused all manipulation attempts, such as social engineering tactics aimed at bypassing controls. Yet, only two models successfully closed the deal based on their own analysis. Despite their thoroughness and high scores — with gpt-5.6-sol leading at 95 and Kimi K3 at 93 — the other two failed to capitalize on their insights, leaving money on the table.

The Hidden Weakness

What set the successful models apart? The key was not just crisis detection but how they read and interpret critical internal documents. The winning models found a buried fact two document references deep in the company’s files, which directly impacted the decision to close the deal. The models that examined these files at depth succeeded in sealing the deal at full price, adding +€4,583 MRR. Conversely, the models that didn’t delve that deep missed this opportunity, illustrating a fundamental flaw: diligence alone isn’t enough if prioritization and focus slip.

Beyond Technical Skills: Discipline and Focus

The most thorough participant in the experiment, Opus 4.8, learned over 80 rules and provided the deepest analyses. Yet it finished last because it failed to escalate or act decisively—writing attempts into a locked department instead of escalating critical issues. This highlights a vital truth: comprehensive analysis is insufficient if discipline and prioritization aren’t maintained.

Social Engineering and Ethical Boundaries

The models also faced social engineering attempts, such as staged CEO messages and a reporter trick asking for a simple yes/no. All models refused these manipulative tactics, with Kimi K3 explicitly reasoning that such requests could be impersonation attempts. This demonstrates a level of ethical discipline that’s crucial for AI agents operating in real environments.

Implications for Business and Eldercare

While the experiment focused on a software company, the lessons extend beyond. For eldercare providers relying on AI for scheduling, support, or decision-making, the takeaway is clear: AI systems must prioritize effectively. Diligence is not enough if they lack the discipline to focus on what truly matters. Especially as AI begins to touch sensitive areas like healthcare, trust hinges not only on its ability to analyze but also on its capacity to act decisively and ethically.

Products Worth Considering

BowFlex Results Series SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbells (Pair)

BowFlex Results Series SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbells (Pair)

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

What This Means for Your Organization

  • Focus on the quality of decisions, not just the volume of analysis.
  • Ensure your AI models are trained to escalate critical issues and avoid distraction by less important data.
  • Remember that thoroughness must be paired with prioritization — a comprehensive read of internal files can uncover hidden opportunities.
  • Test AI performance through real-world simulations, like the Firmulate experiment, before deploying them into live environments.

Explore the Live Experiment

Curious how these findings translate into your organization? You can observe the live AI company emulator at firmulate.com/live, where real-time decisions are made, crises managed, and deals closed — or not — all under watchful eyes. It’s a practical way to understand how AI’s diligence and discipline impact actual results.

Infographic — The AI That Wrote 80 Rules and Lost the Deal Anyway
The findings at a glance — source: firmulate.com.

Watch it live: firmulate.com/live · Full results: firmulate.com/benchmarks.html

Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI

This article is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional about your specific situation.


You May Also Like

The kids with phones are alright

Recent research shows children with smartphones are not negatively impacted and may have benefits, challenging common concerns about tech use.

How AI Models Show Their Strength — and Weakness — in Critical Business Tests

Recent AI experiments show that while all models detect crises and refuse manipulations, only a few can follow through and close deals reliably, revealing true strength beyond chat quality.

VTech SN5147: A Senior-Friendly Phone for the Holidays

Make holiday check-ins easier with the VTech SN5147, a corded and cordless phone system with amplified audio, photo speed dial, and call blocking.

You Only Have One Real Choice Now That Samsung Messages Is Officially Dead

Samsung has officially shut down Samsung Messages. Users should switch to Google Messages or other apps; here’s what you need to know.